Open Ledger.

The first of the cool reframes, and the first direction to drop warmth entirely. Everything Trillium says is an entry in an account: a line, a value, and the name of whoever is answerable for it — including the lines that aren’t flattering.

Palette one hue at four chroma levels Type Newsreader / Public Sans Tier Cool reframe · coral retired

The device

A claim you can’t check is an advertisement. A claim with a value beside it is an entry.

Direction 02 makes the price visible. This one makes the whole account visible — every line of what you get, what it costs, and who performs it. The unit of design is not the number. It is the line item.

As the category writes it

“Affordable, transparent care with no hidden fees and everything included.”

Four positive assertions, nothing itemised, nothing attributable, nothing a reader could check. “No hidden fees” is a claim about the absence of something, which is the least verifiable shape a sentence can take.

On this direction

LinePerformed byAmount
Tirzepatide, 3-month starterPartner pharmacy$399
Provider evaluationWasef Health$0
Membership$0
ShippingPartner pharmacy$0
Total, three months$399

Same information, restructured until it can be argued with. Every line names who performs it, which does the three-entity separation without a disclaimer, and the total is arithmetic rather than a claim.

01 · Why this one

The compliance requirement, promoted to the brand.

Trillium has to say, on every surface, that it does not practise medicine, does not dispense, does not screen patients clinically and does not decide who is eligible. Today that lives where every company puts it: in grey type at the bottom, phrased defensively, read by nobody.

This direction moves it to the middle of the page and sets it in the same type as everything else. Not as a disclaimer but as the negative column of the account — the things Trillium does not do, itemised, each with the name of the party that does. In a category where the central anxiety is who is actually responsible for this, a legible answer is worth more than another reassurance.

That is the whole argument. The visual system exists to make it possible: an account has to look like an account, which means rules, columns, aligned figures and a total. Any decorative move that breaks the alignment breaks the credibility.

Where it sits against 02

02 The Price Is the Picture and 05 Open Ledger both trade on transparency, and they are not the same bet. 02 argues that one number, shown before signup, wins the category — it is a conversion argument, and the sharper of the two commercially. 05 argues that the structure of the business is the thing worth showing, which is a legitimacy argument and a slower one. If pricing is the wedge, build 02. If the problem is that people don’t know what Trillium is, build this.

02 · Palette

One hue, four chroma levels, and no semantic colour at all.

Every other direction in the slate pairs a ground with a contrasting accent. This one refuses to: the ground, the rules, the ink and the accent are all the same violet at different saturations. The discipline is the point — an account rendered in several colours is an account someone has been editing.

The lane matters too. The survey found mid purple occupied by one brand of thirty-five, but pale lilac grounds by five — so a lilac page with a purple accent is nearer the crowd than it looks. Pulling the whole system onto one desaturated violet axis, closer to ruled ledger paper than to lavender, puts it somewhere nobody is.

#E8E6EFPaper. The ground everywhere. Cool, low chroma, closer to ruled stock than to lilac.
#F4F3F8Card. One step lighter, for raised surfaces and alternating bands. Never a border on its own.
#1B1830Ink. All type, all figures, both columns of the ledger. The reverse band’s ground.
#4E3F8CIris. Rules, column headers, links and the CTA. The only saturated thing on the page.
#8B7FD0Lifted iris. Exists solely so the accent survives on the ink band at 4.95:1.
#4A4663Muted. Secondary text at 7.2:1. Replaces grey, which would break the single-hue rule.
PAPER 58% CARD 16% INK 20% 6%
PairRatioResult
Ink on paper13.93 : 1AAA
Ink on card15.59 : 1AAA
Iris as text on paper7.04 : 1AAA
Muted on paper7.24 : 1AAA
Paper on ink (reverse band)13.93 : 1AAA
Lifted iris on ink4.95 : 1AA · large only
The rule that falls out of it

There is no green tick and no red flag anywhere in this system, and that is deliberate rather than an omission. The negative column — what Trillium doesn’t do, what isn’t included, what a provider might decline — is set in exactly the same ink at exactly the same weight as the positive one. A ledger that colour-codes is editorialising, and the moment it editorialises it stops being evidence. Semantic colour is available only for genuine interface states: a failed payment, a form error.

03 · Typography

The typeface of a public record.

Public Sans is the face of the U.S. Web Design System — the typeface federal agencies use for public-facing interfaces. For a compounded-medication company whose central problem is legitimacy, setting the account in the type of a government form is not a neutral choice. It is the argument.

Newsreader carries the display sizes: a text-first serif with real optical sizing, which keeps the headlines editorial rather than promotional. The pairing reads as record and commentary — a document with a voice, not a landing page with a headline.

Everything numeric is set font-variant-numeric: tabular-nums lining-nums without exception. In a design whose credibility rests on columns lining up, a proportional figure is a bug.

Page headline
Newsreader 300
−0.035em · 0.98
Everything you pay for.
Ledger line
Public Sans 400
15px · 1.5
Provider evaluation and prescription decision
Performed by
Public Sans 700
0.11em caps
muted
Wasef Health · independent
Amount
Public Sans 600
tabular lining
$0.00
Total
Newsreader 400
−0.02em
2px rule above
$399.00
Column header
Public Sans 700
0.15em caps · iris
Line · Performed by · Amount

04 · Photography

Cool light, and someone checking the numbers.

Every set built so far is lit by warm lamps at the end of the day. This one is the opposite and it should be: bright overcast north light, pale rooms, blue-grey shadows. The subject is the ordinary domestic act of going through what you owe — the moment a person is being their own accountant.

ReconcilingA statement, a laptop and a calculator, checked against each other. Concentration rather than pleasure — this is the expression the direction is built on, and there is no version of it that smiles.

Going through it togetherTwo people and a sorted stack of mail, one pointing at a line. The only soft smile in the set, and it belongs to the person who is being shown something rather than the one explaining.

Level, not warmDirect gaze, no smile, a folder held rather than displayed. Cool light on a pale wall. The register is competence, which is what an account asks you to trust.

Ruling a lineA pen drawn down the margin of a ruled statement. This is the brand’s own gesture photographed literally, and it is the frame that would carry the identity on its own.

A room being usedPapers in two piles, a corkboard, nobody looking at the camera. Wide enough to sit under type in the mock’s hero band without fighting it.

The object itselfAn open ruled book, squared envelopes, a calculator. The set needs frames with nobody in them, and on this direction they carry more weight than the portraits.

Lean into

  • Bright overcast daylight, high-key and airy. Cool is the point; gloomy is the failure.
  • Paper as a subject. Ruled columns, sorted piles, squared envelopes.
  • Concentration and composure. Nobody in this set needs to be enjoying themselves.
  • The domestic side of an account — a kitchen table, not a finance department.
  • Objects without people. On this direction they are the strongest frames in the set.
  • Casting genuinely spread by age and race, and at least one subject over sixty.

Avoid

  • Warm lamplight. It belongs to 01, 03 and 04 and it undoes the reframe instantly.
  • Cool read as cold — crushed blacks, grey skin, empty rooms. Bright, not bleak.
  • Stock finance imagery: rising graphs, piggy banks, coins, a hand shaking a hand.
  • Anything clinical. No scrubs, no exam rooms, no pharmacy benches.
  • Legible figures on any document. A readable number invents a claim.
  • Bodies as evidence. No waist crops, no isolated abdomens, arms or chins.
  • Screens showing real interface. A mocked dashboard dates the whole set.
The one thing this direction makes easy

Of the five built so far, this is the only one that can ship without photographing a single identifiable person. Half the set is already objects and hands, and the argument is carried by the ledger rather than by faces. Where 04 Word of Mouth cannot run on synthetic imagery and 03 needs a real team shoot, 05 could launch on still life and licensed stock while a proper shoot is scheduled — which makes it the cheapest of the five to get live.

05 · The website

Homepage, in your block order

The live sequence, with the account opened in the hero instead of a value proposition, and one section added that only this direction can carry: the negative column. Rules draw themselves in as each block arrives, the nav lifts on scroll, and every figure is tabular so nothing shifts as the totals land.

trytrillium.com
Please allow 7–10 business days for delivery of your orderPharmacies are closed on weekends

Tirzepatide · GLP-1 weight management · All 50 states + Puerto Rico

Everything you pay for.
And everything you don’t.

Trillium is an administrative and ordering platform. Below is the whole account, before you give us anything.

Get StartedSee full pricing
LinePerformed byAmount
Tirzepatide, 3-month starterNew to GLP-1 medicationsPartner pharmacy$399
Provider evaluation and prescription decisionWasef Health$0
Membership or subscription fee$0
Shipping, cold chain includedPartner pharmacy$0
Total, first three months$399

10K+ patients servedTrustpilot 4.6Full-time support staffPause anytimeLegitScript certified

How it works

Four steps, each with the party that performs it and the time it actually takes.

StepPerformed byTakes
Secure health intakeYour history and current health, in privateTrillium10–15 min
Provider review and eligibilityAn independent licensed provider, not TrilliumWasef Health1–2 days
Prescription decisionIssued only if appropriate, under applicable lawWasef HealthProvider’s call
Compounding and fulfilmentLicensed compounding pharmacyPartner pharmacy7–10 days

What Trillium doesn’t do

The other half of the account. Same type, same weight, same column — because the things we are not responsible for are the most useful things on this page.

Not performed by TrilliumWho does 
Deciding whether treatment is appropriate for youWasef Health
Writing the prescriptionWasef Health
Compounding, filling or shipping the medicationPartner pharmacy
Practising medicine, in any stateWasef Health
Guaranteeing you will be approvedNo platform can, and one that implies it is telling you something untrue

Treatments

Prices on the page, with the plan structure attached and the provider group named.

Now available

Weight management

Compare pharmacies for compounded GLP-1 and GLP-1 options. Tirzepatide and Semaglutide.

$133/MO

View pricing

Tirzepatide · 3-month starter · new to GLP-1 only

Prescribed independently by Wasef Health

Coming soon

Longevity

A considered approach to long-term health goals.

Not yet available

Notify me

Not yet accepting patients

Your care, in one place.

One portal for messages, doses and shipments — and a named person on the other end of it.

Provider chat

Your care conversation, in context

Dose tracking

Schedule and medication log

Shipments

Treatment and delivery status

Read the whole account
before you open one.

Real prices on the page, independent licensed providers, and no membership fee to find out whether it’s appropriate for you.

Get Started

06 · Consequences

What choosing this commits you to

AreaConsequence
AccuracyEvery published line becomes a number someone can hold you to. A price change, a shipping fee, a pharmacy switch or a plan restructure has to reach the homepage the same week it happens. The device is only as trustworthy as the last time the ledger was reconciled — and unlike a claim, a wrong figure is provably wrong.
Source of truthThe figures have to read from the Bask product directory rather than from hand-written copy, or they will drift within a quarter. This is the one direction of the five that arguably needs an engineering task before it can launch honestly.
Pricing exposureA full itemised account is the easiest thing in the world for a competitor to undercut line by line. 02 shows one number; this shows the whole structure. Worth deciding whether that openness is a moat or a gift.
CoralRetired, and further than in the warm directions — there is no warm hue anywhere in the system. Existing ad and social templates do not survive this at all, and the shift would be visible to anyone who knows the brand.
ToneCool, spare and institutional. It reads as competent rather than kind, which suits the anxious researcher persona and is the least warm option in the slate for someone arriving frightened. Warmth would have to come entirely from photography and support copy.
PhotographyThe lightest requirement of the five. Half the set is objects and hands; it can launch on still life while a proper shoot is scheduled.
AccessibilityInk on paper clears AAA at 13.93:1 and iris as text at 7.04:1. The single constraint is the lifted iris on the ink band at 4.95:1 — large text and non-text only, never body copy.
Founder visibilityLow, and structurally so. This direction attributes claims to entities rather than people, which makes it the natural fallback if the 03 consents don’t land — it gets the accountability without needing anyone to be named.
📌 Decision needed — the negative column has to be signed off

“What Trillium doesn’t do” is the strongest section in this direction and the one most likely to be softened into uselessness by the first review. It is worth agreeing up front that the list ships in plain language or the direction doesn’t ship at all — a hedged negative column is just a disclaimer that has been moved up the page.

🚩 Compliance flag — two lines to verify before this is public

The mock states $0 shipping with cold chain included and $0 membership fee. The membership figure matches the live site; the shipping line I have inferred from the plan structure and it needs confirming against the Bask product directory, because on this direction an unverified line is worse than on any other — the entire device asserts that these numbers are checkable. The $133/mo Tirzepatide starter figure is still not published anywhere and needs the same confirmation.

What it does with the frozen figures

Nothing here uses the recommend-rate number, the dispute count, the internal competitor comparison, or the service-posture line pending sign-off. The ledger only ever carries figures that come from the product directory or the live site, which is why it routes around the frozen entries by construction rather than by choice.